In some ways, the heart of this issue is probably somewhere between Eggers' editorial pamphlet -- which includes a "Bill of Rights" on book design, asserting that writers should have a clear and unambiguous role in the design of their own work -- and Paul Maliszewski's pamphlet "Paperback Nabokov," which details the author's struggle to control the design of his book jackets. In short, it's about a writer-centered control of aesthetics, which is not quite how
The pamphlets themselves reflect that idea
The box is an unusual enough format that the only direct predecessor I can find is a French arts publication from 1937, Verve -- described in this 1988 NY Times appreciation -- that used a box designed by Matisse to
McSweeney's revisited the format in 2006 with Issue 19, designed as a series of both new and historical pamphlets -- packed in a cigar box, as if one had found it in an old attic:
My favorite example, though, might be Dancing Star #26 (2002), which shows the direct influence of McSweeney's #4. While touring for Banvard's Folly in 2001, I included random odd Victorian finds in my readings, and at one event an Indiana University college student approached me afterwards. Could he use one of those old excerpts in a magazine he was editing for his dorm? Sure, I said. Some months later, this extraordinary production arrived in the mail:
Inside was a set of pamphlets....
And beneath those was a figurine...
(This is only 2 panels: the poster's much bigger when fully unfolded.)
That student, as it happens, was none other than Brian McMullen. Ten years after Dancing Star 26, he created this boxed Issue 36 of McSweeney's: